On Mon, 08 Aug 2016 23:22:18 -0400, Robert Seward wrote: >Why not a flatpak or snap?
Hi, I'm not one of the developers, just another subscriber. Have you ever build a snap? Feel free to provide one. Assuming you should provide one, how do the developers know that bugs are related to Evolution development and not to the snap? I'm subscribed to [email protected] and even installed it for my Arch Linux. Snapcraft at least is immature and very complicated. For a developer it would be less work to provide binaries and dependencies installed to /opt, without linking against shared libraries. For a user the easiest way would be to use a rolling release model distro. I haven't tested flatpak. This btw. is another issue, that there are so many similar approaches, flatpak and snap aren't the only approaches. Which one, if any, is worth the learning curve and which one would anyway, soon or later not work on several distros? Regards, Ralf _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
