On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 11:46 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2017-03-16 at 02:31 +0100, Ángel wrote: > > On 2017-03-16 at 00:44 +0000, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > > > Even if we assume this is a reliable way to catch replies to digests, > > > there is nothing in the Mailman admin interface to specify filtering > > > criteria, other than a) non-membership of the list, or b) message body > > > is too large (40k currently). Such messages are held for moderation, so > > > filtering, including spam filtering, is being done manually by your > > > trusty moderators. It averages 2 or 3 per day so not a huge burden at > > > the moment. > > > > Did you look at header_filter_rules and bounce_matching_headers ? > > > > I assume their screen will be available at > > https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/admin/evolution-list/privacy/spam > > I hadn't noticed that. Thanks for the tip, I'll take a look. (We don't > get an "Intro to List Moderation" course :-)
OK, I've added the filter expression you suggested. If it works, replies to digests should be held for moderation and we can consider not removing the digest facility. Perhaps some digest fans could test this by replying to a digest. Please mark your replies with "TEST" in the Subject line. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
