Milan, thank you for taking the time to look at this for me. On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 08:55 +0200, Milan Crha wrote: > As far > as I can tell, that message is not sent by Evolution. There is > a User-Agent header which claims: > > User-Agent: Kronolith H5 (4.2.16) > > You begun with "user using also Evolution", thus I guess he/she > doesn't > use it for calendar invitations.
I have personally watched him use the Evolution interface to generate the invitations in question. > It doesn't matter that much, it was > only the most confusing part about your query. What other parts are confusing? > > The message itself has quite complicated structure (Evolution doesn't > send such structures with meeting invitations): > > multipart/mixed > multipart/alternative > text/plain > multipart/related > text/html > image/png > text/calendar (name=event-invitation.ics) > application/ics (name=event-invitation.ics) > > That's all valid and fine, only your evolution 3.22.6 doesn't handle > it > properly. That had been fixed with [1], which is included in 3.24.0+. > Bye, > Milan > > [1] https://git.gnome.org/browse/evolution/commit/?id=4213ff83129b Good to know that newer versions handle this correctly, though it will be some time before most of the user base is at 3.24+. I'm not clear on what the life-cycle of an Evolution release is. Do versions other than current stable get bug fixes? And is your commit referenced above considered a bug fix or a feature addition?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list [email protected] To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
