On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 20:46 +0200, Andrea Vai wrote: > Hi, > 2018-07-12 19:09 GMT+02:00, Pete Biggs <p...@biggs.org.uk>: > > On Thu, 2018-07-12 at 18:07 +0100, Pete Biggs wrote: > > > > It would be less prone to misinterpretation if it had a different name. > > > > It's really not intended as a backup mechanism, as some people seem to > > > > think. Perhaps Export/Import would better convey the idea. > > > > > > > > > > It's difficult. To me Export/Import implies standard formats - which > > > the Evolution backup isn't. > > > > > > > Actually, what I mean is the Export/Import implies the ability to > > transfer things to a different application - the Evolution backup is > > only useful to Evolution. > > I remember a discussion on this list, not long time ago, about a > better name to use for the evolution "Backup" feature, and perhaps > someone may have filed a bug which aimed to choose a convenient name > for it. At the moment I cannot get some precise reference (and my > memory may be wrong).
Probably me, but I never filed a BZ because I couldn't think of a good alternative name. poc _______________________________________________ evolution-list mailing list evolution-list@gnome.org To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ... https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
