Am Samstag, den 03.08.2019, 22:45 +0100 schrieb Patrick O'Callaghan:
> On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 23:21 +0200, Volker Wysk wrote:
> > > > So your suggestion is to change the IMAP protocol and have all
> > > > IMAP
> > > > servers implement the change. Good luck with that.
> > >
> > > No. I'm just trying to make things clear.
> > >
> > > I'd suggest, is that evolution should just ignore the server's
> > > response ("invalid id") in the context which we have here, since
> > > it
> > > can
> > > be perfectly okay, and not be a server-side error.
> >
> > I mean, evolution should ignore the server's response and cancel
> > what
> > it was about to do. Of course it can't just continue, after the
> > "invalid id" response has happened.
>
> So to repeat what I already said: you're proposing that Evolution
> should ignore a server-side error on the supposition that it might
> not
> be an error.
I wouldn't call the server's response an error.
Any better idea?
Volker
_______________________________________________
evolution-list mailing list
[email protected]
To change your list options or unsubscribe, visit ...
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/evolution-list
