On 29 Mar 2001 10:44:28 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Actually I find that evolution's Imap support is pretty quick. The MAIN problem > I'm having is that Evolution doesn't stay running very long before the mail > component dies. I've done killev and oafd-slay and rerun Evolution. It stays > up for a while and then dies again. My backup is Outlook in Win4Lin until > Evolution stabilizes some more (and I have to admit, it gets better with EACH > and EVERY snapshot release..great work guys) and then I'll get rid of Outlook > permanently. > > I wondering, I have a copy of Nautilus 1.0 installed along w/Evolution and I > notice that it appears as if some of the packages used by Nautilus are later > than the Ximian packages. Specifically, in Ximian it uses > control-center-1.2.2-0_helix_1, Evolution uses control-center-1.2.3-100_helix... > and nautilus uses control-center-1.3.90-0_plain_0. I wonder if this has > something to do w/my problems. Well i dunno, reports of evolutions stability vary. Its been pretty good for me but i just pop stuff to inbox only (but it is what I've been using for my daily email for months now). Now we've branched for 0.10, stability should be getting a lot better in the snapshots. > Also, I was wondering about LDAP support. Do I have to recompile Evolution > locally w/LDAP support or is this just functionality that isn't there yet? You must compile it with ldap support yes. The packages can't because it needs to link with a library that violates the gpl ... (openldap, sigh a sucky problem for us). !Z > Thanks > > -C > > > > --__--__-- > > > > Message: 28 > > Subject: Re: [Evolution] IMAP in Evolution is SLOOOOOOOOOOW. > > From: Joe Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Austin Gonyou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: 29 Mar 2001 12:46:45 -0500 > > > > On 29 Mar 2001 11:29:11 -0600, Austin Gonyou wrote: > > > I have several thousand messages in IMAP on the server. When doing an > > > update, it takes a long freakin time, (several minutes), and then only > > the > > > folder I was currently on was updated. Can anyone shed some light on > > this? > > > > I have a similar setup (a single INBOX with ~25000 messages in it) that > > I access through IMAP. Of course, the first time you run it it'll take > > forever because it has to summarize it, but after that, IMAP is quite > > quick for me. There's the overhead of actually downloading the message, > > but that goes away once you read a message once as it is cached on the > > local disk. I am using CVS HEAD, though. The main problem I've seen > > recently is a bit of lag in the GUI when new messages come in (the GUI > > blocks for a second or two and then the message list loses its focus). > > VFolders seem a little slow too and the number of unread messages isn't > > being updated correctly, but I am just getting back into the swing of > > using VFolders. > > > > Joe > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
