On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 13:33, Andrew Cowie wrote: > On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 13:17, Not Zed wrote: > > > On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 18:43, Andrew Cowie wrote: > > > Is it just me, or is the "Specific Header" selection missing from the > > > vFolder search criteria missing? It's mentioned in Evolution's Help... > > Not Zed replied: > > Yes, its not there intentionally. > > > > To make vfolders more efficient, they mostly only work on in-memory data > > which only includes some specific headers. > > Hrm. > > Ok, well, here's what I'm trying to do: My incoming email is filtered > server side. Among other things, it is passed through bogofilter to mark > spam. I am shunting the mail to various folders using maildrop, > specifically sending spam to a Spam folder. > > All these Maildirs are then brought down to my laptop using offlineimap > (sorry guys, but I got tired of evolution's less-than-ideal IMAP > implementation causing evolution to barf). Evolution has one mail > source, a local Maildir tree of folders.
Why appologise? Its crap and we know it. > I have a vFolder called "Unread" which (you guessed it!) is all unread > messages. The trouble is that the shunted Spam is, although correctly > identified and moved out of the way, still marked unread of course. I If you are using maildir, then just set the [S]een flag on the message when it gets moved to the spam folder. The flag is specified as part of the filename, using the standard maildir mechanism, of appending ":2,XXX" to the filename. e.g. 12122.zZedZone.12:2, is unread 12122.zZedZone.12:2,S is seen (read). This could possibly be done as a post-process on the download script. > can't filter out these messages in my vFolder spec because evolution no > longer supports vFolders on arbitrary headers and so I can't filter on > X-Spam-Status (in this case). no longer? it never supported arbitrary headers. > Manually specifying the folders for the vFolder to work on is not an > attractive option, as I have LOTs of inbound folders; it's only one that > I want to exclude. I thought we could probably add a 'all folders but these' filter type, but haven't looked into it further than that bean of a thought. > Any suggestions? _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
