Am Mit, 2003-07-16 um 06.03 schrieb Not Zed: > On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 03:24, guenther wrote: > > > > AFAIK there is currently no way of not downloading attachments. However, > > > > as the IMAP code is planned to be rewritten for 1.6, maybe this will > > > > make it in the new code as an option? > > > > > > > > Jeff, what do you think? > > > > > > this feature is actually already implemented, however what is probably > > > happening is that the attachment parts are not tagged with an > > > appropriate Content-Type an so evo says "I have no idea what mime-type > > > this part is, so I better sniff it" and so in order to do that it has to > > Well afaict (from when i was working on the display rewrite which i > really need to get into cvs soon) the code should only do this if the > attachment is already downloaded (i.e. local), otherwise it just treats > it as unknown ... > > Its a different case if the disposition on the attachment is 'show > inline', its always downloaded in that case (and sniffed if required). Inline attachment are no problem, as these are usually pictures which are not so large (in bytes).
> > > > download the particular attachment. This should only be happening if the > > > Content-Type is application/octet-stream tho. > > > > What I (and probably Axel) was thinking of would be an option, to never > > load attachments, until I willingly requested so. (Then use the cache, > > as currently, so I do not have to load it everytime I wanna see it.) > > This would only cover attachments right? (e.g. not inline pics in html > stuff?). > > We could just add a very trivial-to-implement 'dont show attachments > inline by default' option. Which is probably the crux of the issue. Oh yes. This would be nice. -- Axel Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IWE, Universitaet Karlsruhe (TH) _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
