Re: [Evolution] problems with imap ssl

Tue, 22 Jul 2003 12:14:00 -0700



David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 15:06, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
  
right, hence the way it is done now.
    

Which is sane enough -- it's just that the nomenclature is currently
somewhat misleading.

*nod*


There _may_ be people who want '993 or 143+TLS or 143 plain' but to be
honest I doubt they'll be unable to manage with one of the current
options '993 or 143+TLS' and '143+TLS or 143 plain'.





yea, I think they can definetely manage - whether we should change the
menus to be more clear or something is up to Anna (and how to word it).
I wonder what other clients like Mozilla do... maybe I'll have to fire
up ethereal one of these days.



Jeff




























					Reply via email to