please remove our email!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 6:15 PM Subject: evolution digest, Vol 1 #306 - 12 msgs
> Send evolution mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of evolution digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. RE: IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4 (Cabral, Carlson) > 2. RE: IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4 (guenther) > 3. RE: IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4 (Cabral, Carlson) > 4. RE: IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4 (guenther) > 5. Re: Evo 1.4 -- Killing X? (Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper) > 6. No more detachable menus? (Stuart Luppescu) > 7. Re: No more detachable menus? (Norman P. B. Joseph) > 8. Re: No more detachable menus? (Jason Tackaberry) > 9. Re: No more detachable menus? (Stuart Luppescu) > 10. Re: IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4: use offlineimap!!! (Alfons Hoogervorst) > 11. Re: Evo 1.4 -- Killing X? (Bradley M Alexander) > 12. How to purge calendar and tasks records. (Ron Hauptfleisch) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > From: "Cabral, Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'Chris Gow' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Evolution] IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4 > Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 08:58:55 -0400 > > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand > this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C34550.B01D8250 > Content-Type: text/plain > > This message might be off-topic, but could you Ximian Monkeys (note, I > capitalized both ;-)) out there give us a hint on when 1.4.1 is scheduled to > be released? I want to use Evolution again... > > Thanks, > > Carlson > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Gow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: July 8, 2003 8:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Evolution] IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4 > > > Tried them all in different combinations...no luck :( > > Any other ideas? > > -- chris > > guenther wrote: > > > I've recently installed Ximian desktop 2.0 on my Suse 8.2 computer and I > > am having issues with getting IMAP in Evolution 1.4 to work. Whenever I > > connect to my IMAP server the message 'Scanning folders in IMAP > > server....' displays for a couple of minutes but no email is ever > > downloaded. I noticed that the pre-release of 1.4 had an issue that > > required you to remove and recreate your IMAP account. I tried that but > > it still didn't work. I can get my mail via IMAP from Mozilla with no > > problem. I get prompted for a login and if I enter the wrong password I > > get an error, so I know it can connect to the server. > > > > > > In the Mail Account Settings under tab Receiving Options, do you have > > disabled "Show only subscribed folders" and set the correct "Folder > > Namespace" if needed? > > > > ...guenther > > > > > > > > > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C34550.B01D8250 > Content-Type: text/html > > <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> > <HTML><HEAD> > <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=US-ASCII"> > <TITLE>Message</TITLE> > > <META content="MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=GENERATOR></HEAD> > <BODY> > <DIV><SPAN class=410185612-08072003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff size=2>This > message might be off-topic, but could you Ximian Monkeys (note, I > capitalized both ;-)) out there give us a hint on when 1.4.1 is scheduled to be > released? I want to use Evolution again... </FONT></SPAN></DIV> > <DIV><SPAN class=410185612-08072003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff > size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV> > <DIV><SPAN class=410185612-08072003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff > size=2>Thanks,</FONT></SPAN></DIV> > <DIV><SPAN class=410185612-08072003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff > size=2></FONT></SPAN> </DIV> > <DIV><SPAN class=410185612-08072003><FONT face=Arial color=#0000ff > size=2>Carlson</FONT></SPAN></DIV> > <BLOCKQUOTE style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"> > <DIV></DIV> > <DIV class=OutlookMessageHeader lang=en-us dir=ltr align=left><FONT > face=Tahoma size=2>-----Original Message-----<BR><B>From:</B> Chris Gow > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <BR><B>Sent:</B> July 8, 2003 8:37 > AM<BR><B>To:</B> [EMAIL PROTECTED]<BR><B>Subject:</B> Re: [Evolution] > IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4<BR><BR></FONT></DIV>Tried them all in different > combinations...no luck :(<BR><BR>Any other ideas?<BR><BR>-- > chris<BR><BR>guenther wrote:<BR> > <BLOCKQUOTE [EMAIL PROTECTED] type="cite"> > <BLOCKQUOTE type="cite"><PRE wrap="">I've recently installed Ximian desktop 2.0 on my Suse 8.2 computer and I > am having issues with getting IMAP in Evolution 1.4 to work. Whenever I > connect to my IMAP server the message 'Scanning folders in IMAP > server....' displays for a couple of minutes but no email is ever > downloaded. I noticed that the pre-release of 1.4 had an issue that > required you to remove and recreate your IMAP account. I tried that but > it still didn't work. I can get my mail via IMAP from Mozilla with no > problem. I get prompted for a login and if I enter the wrong password I > get an error, so I know it can connect to the server. > </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><PRE wrap=""><!----> > In the Mail Account Settings under tab Receiving Options, do you have > disabled "Show only subscribed folders" and set the correct "Folder > Namespace" if needed? > > ...guenther > > > </PRE></BLOCKQUOTE><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML> > > ------_=_NextPart_001_01C34550.B01D8250-- > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > Subject: RE: [Evolution] IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4 > From: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Cabral, Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 08 Jul 2003 15:30:14 +0200 > > > > This message might be off-topic, but could you Ximian Monkeys (note, I > > capitalized both ;-)) out there give us a hint on when 1.4.1 is > > scheduled to be released? I want to use Evolution again... > > I dunno, if one might call me Ximian Monkey, but... > > 1.4.1 will never be released AFAIK, due to a serious bug with those > tarballs 2 weeks ago. ;) > > 1.4.2 will be the next release -- and it seems, release hopefully will > be soon... > > ...guenther > > > -- > char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > From: "Cabral, Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: 'guenther' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Evolution] IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4 > Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 09:35:20 -0400 > > Thanks for your reply guenther. However, I've heard the word "soon" before > :-) I was just wondering _how_soon_ this might be. A week? Two weeks? A > month? And if It's 1.4.2 or 1.4.6, doesn't really matter. All I want is my > favourite program on Earth to work again!!! > > Cheers, > > Carlson > > -----Original Message----- > From: guenther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: July 8, 2003 9:30 AM > To: Cabral, Carlson > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Evolution] IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4 > > > > > This message might be off-topic, but could you Ximian Monkeys (note, I > > capitalized both ;-)) out there give us a hint on when 1.4.1 is > > scheduled to be released? I want to use Evolution again... > > I dunno, if one might call me Ximian Monkey, but... > > 1.4.1 will never be released AFAIK, due to a serious bug with those tarballs > 2 weeks ago. ;) > > 1.4.2 will be the next release -- and it seems, release hopefully will be > soon... > > ...guenther > > > -- > char > *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? > c<<=1: (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ > putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > Subject: RE: [Evolution] IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4 > From: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Cabral, Carlson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 08 Jul 2003 15:49:56 +0200 > > > > Thanks for your reply guenther. However, I've heard the word "soon" before > > :-) I was just wondering _how_soon_ this might be. A week? Two weeks? A > > month? And if It's 1.4.2 or 1.4.6, doesn't really matter. All I want is my > > favourite program on Earth to work again!!! > > Well, as Mark Gordon in the users mailing list exposed his currently > (yesterday) installed Evo version (yes, it was 1.4.2 :) judge the > meaning of "soon" by yourself. > > However, AFAIK there are still some issues with packaging. > > ...guenther > > > -- > char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evo 1.4 -- Killing X? > From: Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Bradley Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Evolution List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 08 Jul 2003 10:33:10 -0400 > > > On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 08:05, Bradley Alexander wrote: > > I have noticed an increasing problem of late, on my Debian/unstable > > workstation. I'm running Evo 1.4.0 from deb from the Debian archive. > > > > I have the same setup. Running 1.4.0-4 from debian sid. And yes, I've > seen what seems to be the same kind of problem. But mine typically > happens when I tell evolution to shut down. I've reported this to the > list in the last month (look for "evolution taking 5+ minutes"...). It > has never been figured out what was causing this horrible problem that > makes my system completely unusable until evo is done. > > I have discovered that if I have more than one dictionary enabled, > things take a REALLY long time (like tabbing off of the To: text field > takes 2+ seconds), and if I only have one dictionary enabled, things > seem snappier. I've also noticed that since I've only enabled one > dictionary (I previously had American, British, and Canadian enabled), > my 5+ minutes of shutdown hell have become more like 1+ minutes. > > Also, I've ran strace after strace on evolution shutting down, and have > captured what it's doing when I see X become completely unresponsive. > It doesn't look like evolution is directly doing anything. The only > weird thing that I see whatsoever is this: > > before I shut evolution down, top shows XFree86 as using around 2k of > SHR memory. When X goes into throes and doesn't come out again for > minutes at a time, I see that it now is using around 40Megs of SHR > memory. I don't know what this means, but it doesn't seem good. =:/ > > Anyone? > > > The problem I have seen manifests itself in one of two ways. Either the > > X process will run away on me (CPU pegs with the prime offender being > > XFree86 at something like 99.7%. I can't get the display to come up at > > the console and generally have to ssh in and kill X), or when working at > > the console, I will do something and it will cause X to kick me out and > > go back to an xdm login. > > > > Have you tried waiting for it? Like I noted above, I've seen this and > have had to wait 5+ minutes some times for X to come back. I'm also > running a P4-1.8 G machine with 1G of RAM (I don't know how that > compares with your machine, but if it's not as robust, the 5+ minutes > may be more like 10+). > > > The thing that I have noticed several times is that the activity that > > causes me to be kicked out when sitting at the console is clicking the > > Send/Receive in Evo. I had it happen to me just this morning with one > > Eterm and evo running. I am beginning to suspect that the runaway > > processes (which generally happen overnight when evo is running as > > opposed to during the day when it is not) is also evo autochecking mail. > > Has anyone seen behavior similar to this? Is there a fix for it? > > > > I sure hope so!! Please keep the list updated, since I'd give money to > not have to go through minutes at a time of a completely useless > computer. > > > Thanks, > -- > > ,-----------------------------------------------------------------// > | Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper :: Numbers 6:22-26 > ` > | All brontosauruses are thin at one end, much MUCH thicker > | in the middle, and then thin again at the far end. That is > | the theory that I have and which is mine, and what it is too. > , > | bash$ :(){ :|:&};: > `----------------------// > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > Disclaimer: This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of > the recipient(s) named above. If you are not an intended recipient, you > may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this > communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete > the original message. > This e-mail expresses views only of the sender, which are not to be > attributed to Rite Aid Corporation and may not be copied or distributed > without this statement. > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > From: Stuart Luppescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: Evolution list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: University of Chicago > Date: 08 Jul 2003 10:00:39 -0500 > Subject: [Evolution] No more detachable menus? > > > --=-ZbTYf4wyZQDeq99CtHLj > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > One thing I really liked about Evolution 1.2 (I guess it was a feature > of Gnome 1.4) is the ability to detach the View -> Message Display menu > and leave it pinned to my desktop, so I could easily view headers or > load images whenever I wanted to. Is there no way to do this anymore > with Evolution 1.4? > --=20 > Stuart Luppescu -=3D- s-luppescu .at. uchicago.edu =20 > University of Chicago -=3D- CCSR=20 > =1B$B:MJ8$HCRF`H~$NIc=1B(B -=3D- Kernel 2.4.20-xfs-r3 =20 > You had some happiness once, but your parents moved > away, and you had to leave it behind.=20 > =20 > > > --=-ZbTYf4wyZQDeq99CtHLj > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc > Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQA/CtyXDBHcBS0tWxMRAouAAKC/b3SR7UrRq8lmnjCFK7Q+b9mRtgCdEeDm > a6sOckHenQp6luLWl5AsWc4= > =6SVD > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --=-ZbTYf4wyZQDeq99CtHLj-- > > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] No more detachable menus? > From: "Norman P. B. Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Evolution list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 08 Jul 2003 11:37:43 -0400 > > Are you also using XD2? > > I have XD2, Evo 1.4 on a Red Hat 9 box, and have detachable menus. > > Try running "gnome-ui-properties". It has a check box for making > toolbars detachable. > > -norm > > > > On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 11:00, Stuart Luppescu wrote: > > One thing I really liked about Evolution 1.2 (I guess it was a feature > > of Gnome 1.4) is the ability to detach the View -> Message Display menu > > and leave it pinned to my desktop, so I could easily view headers or > > load images whenever I wanted to. Is there no way to do this anymore > > with Evolution 1.4? > -- > Norman Joseph, Systems Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] IC|XC > Concurrent Technologies Corporation 814/269.2633 --+-- > Global Systems Center NI|KA > > *** Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a great battle *** > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] No more detachable menus? > From: Jason Tackaberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Evolution list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 08 Jul 2003 11:44:09 -0400 > > On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 11:00, Stuart Luppescu wrote: > > load images whenever I wanted to. Is there no way to do this anymore > > with Evolution 1.4? > > It's a GNOME 2 thing. Run: > > gconftool-2 -s /desktop/gnome/interface/menus_have_tearoff --type bool true > > You'll probably have to restart Evo. > > Jason. > > -- > Jason Tackaberry :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: 705-949-2301 x330 > Academic Computing Support Specialist > Information Technology Services > Algoma University College :: www.auc.ca > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 9 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] No more detachable menus? > From: Stuart Luppescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: "Norman P. B. Joseph" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Evolution list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: University of Chicago > Date: 08 Jul 2003 11:14:09 -0500 > > > --=-UuwfV7iTotZrGXJ2lAe9 > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On ?? 2003-07-08 at 10:37, Norman P. B. Joseph wrote: > > Are you also using XD2? > >=20 > > I have XD2, Evo 1.4 on a Red Hat 9 box, and have detachable menus. > >=20 > > Try running "gnome-ui-properties". It has a check box for making > > toolbars detachable. > > This makes the toolbars detachable. It doesn't have any effect on the > menus. However, Jason Tackaberry's suggestion to run gconftool-2 did the > trick. > > > On Tue, 2003-07-08 at 11:00, Stuart Luppescu wrote: > > > One thing I really liked about Evolution 1.2 (I guess it was a feature > > > of Gnome 1.4) is the ability to detach the View -> Message Display menu > > > and leave it pinned to my desktop, so I could easily view headers or > > > load images whenever I wanted to. Is there no way to do this anymore > > > with Evolution 1.4? > --=20 > Stuart Luppescu -=3D- s-luppescu .at. uchicago.edu =20 > University of Chicago -=3D- CCSR=20 > =1B$B:MJ8$HCRF`H~$NIc=1B(B -=3D- Kernel 2.4.20-xfs-r3 =20 > You're all clear now, kid. Now blow this thing so=20 > we can all go home. -- Han Solo=20 > =20 > > > --=-UuwfV7iTotZrGXJ2lAe9 > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc > Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQA/Cu3RDBHcBS0tWxMRAvdLAKCeCNBBCT9j4AexXS74RRbGbsArbACgu1Eg > UQ0quDqf1RGTTg6OEVLMrgY= > =YpUm > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --=-UuwfV7iTotZrGXJ2lAe9-- > > --__--__-- > > Message: 10 > Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 18:47:23 +0200 > From: Alfons Hoogervorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: HvR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Chris Gow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Evolution] IMAP issues with Evolution 1.4: use offlineimap!!! > Organization: Doubtful > > Lo HvR, > > On 07-07-03 (Mon) 15:22 -0700 HvR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (by way of > Alfons Hoogervorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote: > > Ouch. I was fixing sylpheed claws' redirection stuff. Apologies... > > Bye. > > --=20 > Ecuaci=F3n algebraico sin soluci=F3n posible, > a menos de poseer profundos conocimientos > en matem=E1tica - Revueltas (Ocho Por Radio) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 12:50:43 -0400 > From: Bradley M Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Bradley Alexander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Evolution List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evo 1.4 -- Killing X? > > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 10:33:10AM -0400, Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper wrote: > > > > I have discovered that if I have more than one dictionary enabled, > > things take a REALLY long time (like tabbing off of the To: text field > > takes 2+ seconds), and if I only have one dictionary enabled, things > > seem snappier. I've also noticed that since I've only enabled one > > dictionary (I previously had American, British, and Canadian enabled), > > my 5+ minutes of shutdown hell have become more like 1+ minutes. > > I have never enabled any dictionaries, so whatever comes by default is what > I'm using. > > > Also, I've ran strace after strace on evolution shutting down, and have > > captured what it's doing when I see X become completely unresponsive. > > It doesn't look like evolution is directly doing anything. The only > > weird thing that I see whatsoever is this: > > I haven't straced the problem, as yet, I guess I will do that tonight. > > > before I shut evolution down, top shows XFree86 as using around 2k of > > SHR memory. When X goes into throes and doesn't come out again for > > minutes at a time, I see that it now is using around 40Megs of SHR > > memory. I don't know what this means, but it doesn't seem good. =:/ > > > > Anyone? > > > > > The problem I have seen manifests itself in one of two ways. Either the > > > X process will run away on me (CPU pegs with the prime offender being > > > XFree86 at something like 99.7%. I can't get the display to come up at > > > the console and generally have to ssh in and kill X), or when working at > > > the console, I will do something and it will cause X to kick me out and > > > go back to an xdm login. > > > > > > > Have you tried waiting for it? Like I noted above, I've seen this and > > have had to wait 5+ minutes some times for X to come back. I'm also > > running a P4-1.8 G machine with 1G of RAM (I don't know how that > > compares with your machine, but if it's not as robust, the 5+ minutes > > may be more like 10+). > > Usually, when the hard lockup happens, it's overnight, and since its not > writing to any logs that I have yet found, but I would suspect that its > happening several hours before I find it. The machine is a 1.0GHz Athlon-C > machine with 768MB RAM. > > -- > --Brad > ============================================================================ > Bradley M. Alexander | > gTLD SysAdmin, Security Engineer | storm [at] tux.org > Debian/GNU Linux Developer | storm [at] debian.org > ============================================================================ > Key fingerprints: > DSA 0x54434E65: 37F6 BCA6 621D 920C E02E E3C8 73B2 C019 5443 4E65 > RSA 0xC3BCBA91: 3F 0E 26 C1 90 14 AD 0A C8 9C F0 93 75 A0 01 34 > ============================================================================ > Sushi? Where I'm from, we call this stuff "bait." > --Terry Bradshaw > > --__--__-- > > Message: 12 > Subject: [Evolution] How to purge calendar and tasks records. > From: Ron Hauptfleisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Evolution Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 08 Jul 2003 13:14:34 -0400 > > Is there a way to purge all records from Evolution's calendar which are > older than a certain date? I was unable to find anything in the FAQ or > help. > > Thanks > -- > Ron Hauptfleisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > End of evolution Digest _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
