On Wed, 2003-08-27 at 14:13 +0200, guenther wrote: > Now, *this* is a good idea, bravo. I like this. Have you already filed > it in bugzilla?
I haven't. > Wondering: Trigger on "missing 'Re:'" or trigger on "not including large > parts of original Subject"? What about "new-subject (was: old-sbuject)" > messages? In practice it's usually "New-subject (was Re: old-subject)" and my trigger for that does permit 'Re: ' to be _anywhere_ in the subject line. The rest I approve manually upon investigation, if it's actually a sane subject change but still related to the thread to which it's replying. -- dwmw2 _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
