On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 11:17, guenther wrote: > > > Maybe this is simply a regression bug? > > > > I don't know. What I don't understand is why what appears to be an older > > version (admittedly for a slightly different OS) works yet the current > > doesn't. > > Well, that is easy: Evolution 1.4 is mainly a port of the 1.2 version to > Gnome 2. If this particular code was ported and therefore uses new > functions, errors may happen... ;-) > > That's what I meant by "regression".
Ah. Now I understand what you meant. > > Is it a version problem or an OS one I wonder? Anyone with 1.4.4 or > > 1.4.5 on Red Hat willing to switch to the GB locale and see if the dates > > then work properly. If they do then does that make it a OS/locale > > problem; if not a version one? > > The Red Hat version may be essential, too. What is your RH version? Red Hat version 9. I don't think there's a sub-version number; it's updated to whatever their latest update level is using the Red Hat Network. -- Regards Andy, G8TQH http://www.rickham.net/ _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
