Hmm... I have done some additional investigation... in Squirrel mail: Date:Sun, October 12, 2003 2:02 pm
in Balsa: 07/29/2003 08:02:36 PM -> which seems most correct as the email's author had dated it "inTouch Volume #6 Issue 9 (2003/7/30)" Balsa does through a warning: The message sent by "intouch-at-tuc.org |TUC/1.0-Allow|" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> with subject "inToUCh Volume #6 Issue 9" contains 8-bit characters, but no header describing the used codeset (converted to "?") I added the same account to evo's "Mail Accounts" hoping that this will not look at the cache... still shows funky date. ... this mail msg seems to be "corrupted", but possibly evolution could handle the msg's problems better. At this time, I do not think it is worthwhile to actively pursue this problem, I will keep my eyes open if I find any more emails like this. Cheers, Lloyd On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 08:59, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > we don't parse dates from the message if it came from imap, we use the > INTERNALDATE string that the imap server gives us. > > Jeff > > On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 02:41, Lloyd D Budd wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Love that Ximian Evolution (1.4.5)! > > > > I believe I may be experiencing a very minor bug. In the date column > > there is one email that shows a date of "Dec 22 2013". Viewing the > > email, the date in the header is shown as "Date: Thu, Oct 13 2003 > > 00:02:36 0500" > > > > > > Has this issue previously been reported? What additional information > > can I provide? > > > > Thank you, > > Lloyd > > > > > > > > Complete Header > > --------------- > > > > > > > > Return-Path: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Received: from > > server.xxxxx.xxx > > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by > > foolswisdom.com > > (8.11.x/8.11.x) with > > ESMTP id xxxxx for > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > Thu, 13 Nov 2003 > > 11:18:17 -0500 > > X-ClientAddr: > > 207.106.87.xx > > Received: from > > monkey.sneakemail.com > > (sneakemail.com > > [207.106.87.13]) by > > server.xxxxx.xxx > > (8.11.x/8.11.x) with > > SMTP id xxxxx for > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > > Thu, 13 Nov 2003 > > 11:18:17 -0500 > > Received: (qmail 22161 > > invoked by uid 501); 13 > > Nov 2003 16:19:40 -0000 > > Received: from > > www6.xxxxx.xxx (HELO > > mail.xxxxx.xxx) > > (65.23.128.xx) by > > mail.sneakemail.com with > > SMTP; 13 Nov 2003 > > 16:19:40 -0000 > > Received: by > > mail.xxxxx.xxx (Postfix) > > id 8A87CCCE59; Thu, 13 > > Nov 2003 11:17:06 -0500 > > (EST) > > Received: by > > mail.xxxxx.xxx (Postfix, > > from userid 0) id > > 78AECCC472; Thu, 13 Nov > > 2003 11:17:00 -0500 > > (EST) > > >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > From: intouch-at-tuc.org > > |TUC/1.0-Allow| > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: inToUCh Volume > > #6 Issue 13 > > Date: Thu, Oct 13 2003 > > 00:02:36 0500 > > Sender: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Precedence: bulk > > Reply-To: > > intouch-at-tuc.org > > |TUC/1.0-Allow| > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Message-Id: > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > X-Sneakemail-Label: TUC > > X-Sneakemail-Address: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > X-Sneakemail-Rcpt: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > X-Sneakemail-Keyword: > > 1.0-Allow > > X-Sneakemail-Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > X-Sneakemail-From: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > X-Sneakemail-Is-Sneakemail: yes > > X-Sneakemail-Filter-Pattern: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > X-Sneakemail-Filter-Field: From > > X-Sneakemail-Folder-Path: Desktop > > X-Sneakemail-Inc-Phrase: > > X-Evolution-Source: > > imap://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ > > Mime-Version: 1.0 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
