man, 12.01.2004 kl. 18.24 skrev Patrick O'Callaghan: > > > or 2) put certain "special" folders > > > at the top, preferably with distinguishable icons. See Mozilla, Thunderbird, > > > MacOS Mail, etc. etc. > > > > Which are not Evo, though. > > Naturally. But Evo could learn some things from them (and vice versa).
Absolutely ;) If only Evo would learn Courier shared folders and Mozilla how to do all-in-one-screen and LDAP. And more. [...] > > Allowing more than one account is an admin/organization policy decision > > that is not sanctioned here, at Billy. At least, mail may only be sent > > (smtp SASL AUTH) by a system-authorized (LDAP) logged-in UID and > > obviously only be IMAP-read by the same UID. > > You mean you can't read your company mail and your private ISP mail > from the same session? That's what I'm talking about, not having > multiple accounts on the same server (which is also useful in some > cases BTW). I'm the admin who decides at Billy ;) And there's not much managerial opposition to speak of. All the users get their mail on this machine under one account name at the moment, let me think. Say Sammy wanted to get pop mail from his ISP account, into his home directory, next to his local IMAP account, it would be technically possible with Evo. I think I'd block traffic out to destination port 110 or 995 in the firewall; I've seen what my users do to waste time during working hours, playing Kazaa and ICQ and Quake and such. There would have to be a pretty clear agreement with each employer about wasting the boss' time. I already have an contractual agreement to be able to read all their mail, and run Ethereal on their traffic over the Internet interface, so ... --Tonni -- mail: billy - at - billy.demon.nl http://www.billy.demon.nl _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
