On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 13:04 -0500, Mark Gordon wrote: > On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 06:25 -0800, Glen Baker wrote: > > > My first advice would be to try submitting the stack trace (through > > > bugzilla), regardless of whether the stack trace looks useless. > > > > Yeah, I did that and the response was "the stack trace is useless" :( > > > > Since this problem is so flakey (happens often, but not as the result of > > a repeatable series of steps) I think the *only* way to track it downis > > by running an unstripped version of Evo, but so far I can't figure out > > how to get/produce such a version. > > > > Do I need to build from source? If so...where the heck are the sources > > (I've looked around but can't find 'em anywhere, I'm probably blind). > > > > ..glen > > I'm not sure whether the stack was useless because it didn't have > symbols or because the stack had been corrupted. > > Our snapshots are unstripped. Probably more convenient than building > from source, if we're building snaps for your platform. > > -Mark Gordon
Ah, just read http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=53582 Yes, I'd recommend the stable snapshots: Evolution Snapshot, not to be confused with Evolution Development Snapshot. -Mark Gordon _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
