> sudhakar> So the problem now is how to prevent evolution from actually delivering > sudhakar> the mail. Ideas?
hmm... i would have thought that specifying a filter action of "Stop Processing" or "Delete" would have prevented the message from being sent, however, upon brief testing, i have found that this is not the case. It looks like the 'filter does indeed stop processing the message' but then evolution sends the message as a 'post filter' scenario. couple of solutions: * Specify an SMTP in evolution that is an SMTP server that is a dummy SMTP server you have written. The server will need to do nothing other than accept the message and ignore it! * Write a wrapper for sendmail (i don't know how Evo decided where 'sendmail' is located - perhaps the Evo people can enlighten us here)... if its as simple as setting an environment variable so that evo calls your script instead of sendmail, then you can write your own wrapper (and no need for output filter even in that case, as every message will go via your wrapper anyway). If you can't easily specify your own script, then you might need to replace /usr/sbin/sendmail (or similar) with your wrapper (and still no need for output filters). On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 13:07, Sudhakar Govindavajhala wrote: > thanks Lonnie, Christopher, Simran and Not Zed for replies. > > Lonnie: > >From my experience, human intervention will not slow the dy/dx of spam. > > > > That being said I think it is impossible for a legitimate message to be > > sent without a "FROM:" header as the SMTP server asks for it before the > > DATA transaction begins. > > > > I will have a from header, but finally I will just forge the header to > have something else. > > >Sudhakar, I have tried to offer you some ideas, but you seem to have > all > > the answers. I wonder why you are even posting to a mailing list in the > > first place. > > Yes, I did some homework a bit before posting. But then, I wanted to take advantage > of more knowledgeable people there too. :-) > > > Simran, that filter idea was a good one. I did not now about filters > earlier. I think for it to work, I need to somehow send the mail to > SMTP directly (by running an SMTP server) from my script. But then, > evolution tries to send the mail too and I would not want to send the > mail twice. I need to think more about this to prevent evolution from > sending the mail. > > Not Zed, > > > > You should just write a script to make and send the mail directly, not > > use a client. > > > Hmm, I want to use evolution for its GUI. Yes, sending the mail directly by > using the filter is a good idea. But then I need to prevent evolution from actually > delivering the mail too. > I would not want to send ppl two copies. > > > > > > Just copy an existing message and change the from address when you send > > it. You also need to do stuff with the smtp protocol if you want to > > more accurately study how spam is more likely sent. I'm not sure why > > you want to, there's so many examples of it out there! > > Well, sometimes I send some mails to mailing lists and they actually end up being > archived > on the web. Thus my email address is exposed for spam harvesting. Thus I am thinking > that I should rewrite > the from header also when I send the mails so that I avoid exposing my email address > to bots. > > > So the problem now is how to prevent evolution from actually delivering > the mail. Ideas? > > thanks all for the efforts! > > Sudhakar. > > On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 21:28, Not Zed wrote: > > On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 11:21 -0500, Sudhakar Govindavajhala wrote: > > > On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 02:34, Lonnie Borntreger wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2004-03-27 at 23:43 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Now, **each** time I send a mail I would like to be able to change the > > > > > >From field accordingly. Is there a way I can do it in evolution? > > > > > Obviously doing this in settings is not an option. (It is a pain to do it. > > > > > But for research, it is worth the pain.) > > > > > > > > Tools->Accounts->New > > > > > > > > Create an account with the email address you want, set the SMTP but > > > > leave the incoming server info blank. When you are composing an email, > > > > use the From: drop-down to select the email address you want this > > > > particular email to be from. > > > > > > > > > > Nah. that is not what I want. I want to be able to use lets say 100 > > > different addresses. In the solution you proposed, I will have to use > > > 100 different settings. A pain. All I want is to be able to type my > > > email address, the way you type a recipient address. > > > > > > > You should just write a script to make and send the mail directly, not > > use a client. > > > > Just copy an existing message and change the from address when you send > > it. You also need to do stuff with the smtp protocol if you want to > > more accurately study how spam is more likely sent. I'm not sure why > > you want to, there's so many examples of it out there! _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
