On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 00:28, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 19.42 skrev Rick DeNatale: > > > I've had a lot of trouble lately in replying to message from folks like > > Jeffrey and Not Zed who reply directly to me and CC the list, without a > > reply-to header. The default for reply seems to be a direct reply rather > > than reply to list, which I guess makes sense, but it doesn't seem to > > have worked that way. > > OT rant: Anybody but anybody who replies /both/ to me and the list, be > it reply/cc or cc/reply, immediately gets deleted from my inbox without > me reading his message. That includes Ximian notables, Openldap > notables, Postfix notables, whoever. I obviously read the lists I > subscribe to and answer there. Obviously the above doesn't include > private mail :) > > --Tonni
It's a lot easier to set up procmail to eliminate dups, than to change the behavior of a LARGE fraction of the internet. Replying to both, of course, happens because it's often easier few the human replying, and typically only wastes a few cycles. -- Dan Stromberg DCS/NACS/UCI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
