On Sat, 2004-05-01 at 01:49 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > > Blocking all attachments would be a very bad idea IMHO. Stripping those > > infamous attachments would at least save bandwidth and protect anyone > > reading this list with MS clients. Simply rejecting those mails would > > actually keep the list clean but has another bad impact. [1] > > That's policy as decided by management and ITS. One AV vendor at least, > Sophos, recommends banning all attachments
Ironically, banning all attachments would presumably include attached gpg/pgp signatures, thereby defeating one of the few means of actually verifying the authenticity of messages. -Mark Gordon _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
