On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 18:27 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > Well i dont live in the USA, so DMCA is irrelevent (for now, till > 'they' bully our laws to match). > > Anyway, these are NOT anti copying measures at all, merely an > undocumented format, so I very much doubt DMCA has anything to say on > the matter. DMCA is all about intentional anti-copying mechanisms, of > which PST isn't an example.
But it's written broadly enough that it's used for other purposes. > Besides, you're not going to get sued for converting your email. > > Its all just bullshit anyway. Well, yes, but it's still the law in my country, so lawyers can make life difficult and costly. > On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 21:53 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 10:08 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > > On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 12:44 -0400, Wise, Jeremey wrote: > > [snip] > > > > c) Is their an import tool from an Outlook Archive? > > > There's a tool called outport I think? And the libpst code also has a > > > tool to dump a PST file into a set of standard unix mailboxes; i don't > > > know whether those tools provide what you need. Use google, or > > > freshmeat to find them. > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-mentors/2003/04/msg00256.html > > > > I think the only apps that don't breach DMCA are ones that > > are restricted to OE 4.x. > > > > The best thing to do now in use *Windows* Mozilla to convert from > > PST to mbox. -- Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
