List, I'm actually a SpamAssassin (server-side amavisd-new/SA smtp proxy on Postfix 2.1) fan, but it has immense drawbacks (Perl daemon, takes enormous resources - memory, disk I/O - limited user choice without procmail/maildrop filtering and others); so after seeing a couple of glowing dspam reports on the Exim list I installed server-side dspam (2.10.6) in the weekend.
I'm thrilled with it - it's pure Bayes based, but 100% individual choice, works well with Evo (had to make an own mini-sh-script for my Evo filter), trains easily, is fast to learn (after feeding it 1,000+ spam/ham corpi) and dead accurate after a couple of days' teaching. It thought that all of Michael's posts on this list were spam to begin with - strike me, I don't know why - but doesn't any longer :) Drawbacks seem to be high disk I/O and rapidly growing recipient db4 Bayes databases. But zilch memory overhead, no Perl (ANSI C). Has anyone any experience with server-side dspam and Evo over an extended period? Opinions? --Tonni -- We make out of the quarrel with others rhetoric but out of the quarrel with ourselves, poetry. mail: billy - at - billy.demon.nl http://www.billy.demon.nl _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
