On Tue, 2004-05-18 at 11:32 -0400, Brian Ellis wrote: > I think it is important to recognize that currently (to my > understanding) Evolution is in a feature freeze for version 2.0. So > recommending additional features to the developers and then getting > upset that they tell you the software is currently unable to support > that isn't going to help anything. And to make things worse then you > attack their coding abilities.
I wasn't upset that the software couldn't handle the feature, but at the delivery with which one said such. As others have agreed, I thought it could have been expressed less flippantly (as it sounded, not necessarily as it was intended). > It was my understanding that this is the > evolution-users list. A place where users can try to assist each other > with problems that they have encountered with the software. I don't > think this is the proper forum to spout of random feature requests for > the software and sling insults toward the developers. Of course, I wasn't the one who mentioned the feature, nor was this the first instance of such an occurrence. In fact, never has anyone said that one of the other lists would be a more appropriate venue for such, and the two other lists (evo-hackers and -patches) seem inappropriate for suggestions. And again, if my words came off as insulting, I apologise. I repeat, I didn't mean them as such and I am very pleased with Evolution; I wouldn't be subscribed to this list and contributing (somewhat ;) otherwise. Regards to all, Andrew _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
