On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 19:32 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Thu, 2004-06-10 at 19:15, Eric Lambart wrote: > > Well, I answered some of my own questions. I rolled back to the RPMs on > > my other machine, from last week. This devolution allows me to run > > Evolution. Second, I subscribed to XD2 channel and the newest RH9 > > version of GTK2 available is something like 2.24. > > > > Sorry for the questions, Jeff, but your answer, while doubtless true, > > was rather short on details or explanation. So I'm still curious > > (anxious, actually) to know what's going on. Is the new dependency the > > result of a mistake, or are we really going to need at least GTK+ 2.4.x > > to use and test future versions of Evolution? > > gtk+ 2.4.x are currently the only gtk+ releases with the gtktreeview > expander fix. the patch was also applied to gtk+ 2.2.x CVS, but Owen has > not made a release with that fix included (if there is ever a 2.2.5, > then it will be in there).
OK, that's something I can understand. Here's hoping there's a 2.2.5 released at some point soon. Thanks. Eric _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
