> > This just sounds like a namespace thing. Evolution has never
> > supported multiple namespaces - its entirely 'our fault'. Some
> > servers can advertise their namespaces instead as just separate
> > top-level folders rather than the namespace mechamism (effectively,
> > even namespaces means the same thing). Maybe the defaults changed.
> >
> > The bug probably still stands. But if you're happy then good-o.
>
> Oh yes, I'm happy. I still have ha current "wish" standing, for message
> threading by ordered subject, though. I'm fed up with having to start up
> Thunderbird to make any sense of the dspam and similar lists.
Tony, you might want to try a "hidden" feature. There is a GConf key to
enable fallback to thread by subject, if In-Reply-To and References
headers fail.
GConf: /apps/evolution/mail/display/thread_subject
Although this is helpful for lists with a pretty high average
subscribers cluelevel, it can have a very bad side effect on newbie
posts with meaningless subjects...
...guenther
--
char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
