On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 14:03 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > well like what you're doing and whether what you're doing changes the > memory used, etc. whether its stable or growing, and so forth. if > you start in the calendar does it do it, or do you have to switch > components over time, etc etc.
Ok, it happened again. I had Evo "Mail" open for about 24 hours, and suddenly, my interactive response time dropped like a stone. Went to an xterm, and saw that Evo's CPU, VIRT & RES usage had spiked. Some info: Mail stored in an IMAP server All outgoing email is signed using GPG There are 58 local Contacts No tasks No calendar items > the package versions wont be much help; we're not in a position to > debug every line of code that might get executed whilst evolution is > running, and we have no specific information about versions of > libraries in general. > > On Sun, 2004-08-01 at 23:24 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 00:07 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > I've experienced no such leak... any details? > > > > I can provide you with a list of the package names + versions > > that Evo depends on (and what they depend on and what they depend > > on... all the way down to glibc). Been running .91 for about 36 > > hours. > > > > What other details can I give you? > > > > > On Mon, 2004-08-02 at 00:09, Ron Johnson wrote: > > > > Am I the only one to notice this? > > > > > > > > Attached is a screen print of top(1), showing the memory usage. > > > > > > > > Package: evolution1.5 > > > > Version: 1.5.91-1 > > > > Kernel: Linux 2.6.7 > > > > Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US > > > > > > > > This is a pretty recent Sid with Evo from the experimental branch. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Johnson, Jr. Jefferson, LA USA PGP Key ID 8834C06B "Would you mind not firing on the thermonuclear weapons?" A great line, from a *great* movie: Broken Arrow
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
