On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 19:02 +0200, guenther wrote: > > > And the origin of any > > > attachment will be clear without confusion. > > > > Thanks. this actually explains it better. > > I tried to explain this more than once... ;) > > You even can set Forwarding as Attachment as default forwarding action > in the Settings. > > > > Just for my understanding... > > Was this changed in 1.5 from 1.4.6. > > Dunno when exactly the attachment handling changed. But IIRC it where > only minor changes, most of the logic still is the same as it was for a > couple of versions. > > > > I am just a little use to the way > > Outlook did things and I thought that 1.4.6. use to do it in a format > > where text forward/replies were "inline" while attachments always "moved > > with the mail". This is apparently not (no longer) the case. Why is > > that? > > I already expressed my opinion about attachment handling... > > It doesn't make any sense at all to resend attachments when replying -- > cause the one you are replying to just sent you the very same > attachment. So why would I want to send it back? > > When forwarding inline/quoted, the origin of attachments simply is not > clear. Whereas forwarding as attachment leaves the original mail > entirely unaltered and isn't ambiguous about the origin of any > attachment. > > Forwarding as Attachment is the way to go, IMHO. > > ...guenther > This clarified what I needed. It makes sense once it is explained. Hold over thought process from my MS Outlook days.
Thanks, _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
