On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 19:09, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Thu, 2004-09-23 at 15:08 -0400, jack wallen wrote: > > so i was reading up a bit on evo two on the footnotes site. from what > > i've read i might be glad i've not upgraded. sounds like there were some > > pretty major UI changes that, from the descriptions i've read, don't > > sound too enticing. > > > > i think what surprises me the most is that evolution stands a good > > chance at getting a toe-hold in the corporate environment. this is > > partially because it has the element of familiarity (due to it's > > similarities to outlook). but now that is changing i can imagine people > > decided to NOT migrate because it's "different" again. > > > > not only that but the debate about making it 4 separate components? > > hello!!!! that would be a serious step backwards i would think. > > > it's been always 4 separate components. The difference in 2.0 is that we > don't display all calendar/task/mail/contacts folders together, but > separately, and that now it is much quicker, so really worth the upgrade
Excuse me for being dense, but what exactly do you mean that "we don't display all calendar/task/mail/contacts folders together, but separately" ? Do they present as separate apps and each open in a new window, or what? Or has the shortcuts column simply been eliminated in favor of shortcut on a toolbar? Are there screenshots somewhere? Thanks. KJM _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
