On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 15:50 -0800, Dan Stromberg wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-11-01 at 15:14, Jon Biddell wrote:
> 
> > >
> > > If I recall correctly, this was considered and not implemented-- it's
> > > not clear that nearly-identical messages can be identified properly
> > > without a lot of processing.
> > 
> > Interesting - I wonder how the kmail guys do it - it seems to work pretty 
> > well, with only the rarest of false deletions - I had a mailbox with 16k 
> > messages (deliberately created to test it) which was a double-import of 
> > another mailbox - I *knew* there would be exactly 8192 duplicates, and kmail 
> > shot through the file in less than 30 seconds.
> 
> If you want to be quick, you can just delete all but one copy of
> anything with the same Message-id: header.
> 
> If you want to be more thorough, you could additionally generate sha-1
> or md5 hashes of all messages as they come in, perhaps inserting them
> into a heap.

this won't work because often mailing-lists munge headers and add their
own signatures, etc.

on the other hand, if you want this feature because you're
double-importing mbox files every now and then, then it seems to me a
better approach would be to write a script to do it. No sense having Evo
do it then.

Jeff

-- 
Jeffrey Stedfast
Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  - www.novell.com

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to