On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 23:02 +0100, Julio M. Merino Vidal wrote: > Hi all, > [snip] > However, there is no way (or at least I can't see it) to change the > location of the Trash folder. It keeps using a top level trash folder > (listed inside the imap account tree) that seems to be local.
that's because the Trash folder isn't a real folder, it's a virtual folder. the way Trash works is that it knows about all messages in all folders marked for deletion and displays them. This is how IMAP was intended to work by Mark Crispin, the author of the IMAP specification (and in fact is how Pine works as well afaik). > > I want it to use the trash folder in the server, so that deleting a > message "archives" it. In fact, I want no local mail _at all_. Delete on IMAP doesn't move mail, it just sets a flag on the message (\Deleted) > > Is this "feature" unavailable on purpose? yes. users want to be able to later "undelete" a message in Trash and have it go back to where it was originally (same folder, same location in said folder). This is not possible if we really moved the message out of the original folder. > If not, could it be added? > Looks like it should be easy, given it's already present for Drafts > and Sent. the ease of adding this feature has nothing to do with Sent/Drafts folders as it will be nothing like those folders as far as functionality goes. > > - Whenever I move a mail between folders, a copy of it appears in the > trash. think about what a move operation is for a minute, especially considering that IMAP has no notion of "move", only COPY and STORE +FLAGS (\Deleted) > Eww, I've _moved_ it, not _deleted_ it. yes you have, you've COPY'd it to another folder and deleted it. > This makes it > impossible to apply the approach outlined above to manually move > false negatives to the Spam folder, because a duplicate will be > stored in the trash (i.e., in the Archive). why is Trash archived at all? it's Trash. e.g. stuff you don't give a rats arse about. If you care about it, then it isn't Trash. > > It also leaves additional copies of messages in the trash when you > move huge volumes of mail. they aren't copies, they're the originals...located in the original folder. > > Is this behavior intended? yes > If so, which is the rationale behind it? read above comments > Could this be changed to a more normal behavior? with a lot of work, perhaps. > AFAICT, no other > mail client behaves like this... if every mail client was the same, what'd be the point of multiple mail clients? :) > > If any of these get a positive answer, what should I do? Open a bug > report with "wishlist" priority? there's already a feature request for what you want sitting in bugzilla somewhere. Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Novell, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.novell.com
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
