On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 17:35 -0800, Raul Acevedo wrote:
> It's been mentioned three times in the five months I've been on this
> list, but has been shot down by the developers because it is apparently
> a Bad Thing to modify the original email. It's been mentioned even more
> times if you count being able to delete attachments.
>
> However several email clients do this, and I haven't seen mention of
> what exactly would break if evolution would do it. The sense I get is
> that nothing would break, they're just trying to stick to a strict
> RFC-type correlation between message id and original email. ("If you
> modify the email, it needs a new message id.")
>
> Unfortunately there's no way to search the archives, so I don't know the
> details of the original argument against modifying emails. Could a
> knowledgeable person summarize the argument against doing it?
Hmm, there are ways to do this with out altering original message I
would think. I would guess storing the annotations in the summary (like
label info) would be too much for that method though, but I'm not a
mailer expert.
-JP
--
JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Novell, Inc.
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [email protected]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
