On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 10:21 -0500, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Wed, 2005-03-02 at 16:34 -0700, Evolution List wrote: > [snip] > > > > > > wasn't constantly crashing for most people... if it was, we wouldn't > > > have shipped it. > > > > Hmmm...well...all one needs to do is read through reviews of the older > > Evolution to know that it had major problems Jeffrey. Lots and lots of > > problems with instability. Many considered that it was not quite a > > mature project yet and needed a lot of work to get there. At least from > > the reading I did at the time. It was very quirky and unstable for me > > running under KDE. I tried the old one for a day and quickly gave up on > > it. > > I'd bet anything that KDE was applying some theme or another to > Evolution to make it look like other KDE/Qt applications and that's what > was causing the crashes (we got a lot of reports from people running KDE > and it was because of the theme they were using, having them switch to > no theme made all the crashes go away)
The Thin Keramik (sp?) them did have some problems with Evo (and some other GNOME apps I believe). Recent SuSE updates fix this and I imagine its also been pushed upstream. -JP -- JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Novell, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
