On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 13:37 -0400, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 21:17 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > Which imap implementation are you using? "imap4rev1" is newer but > > less > > battle hardened and thus buggier than the "imap" one. I never get > > crashes with it (where 'never' is defined as not enough to notice or > > recall), although I only use it for one mostly idle account (Novell > > mail ...). > > I use IMAP on my office installation of Evo 2.3.3 and IMAP4rev1 on my > home installation of Evo 2.2, both against the same (busy) account (but > not simultaneously). The IMAP4rev1 version freezes and has to be > forceably shut down several times a day. The other one not so much, or > not at all -- I don't remember. The IMAP server is Cyrus on RedHat 9. > > I don't recall seeing warnings about the IMAP4rev1 implementation. I'll > be switching to IMAP as soon as I get home tonight ...
I wonder if we should remove it from the default build (except removing something that is there is always fraught with danger), or at least add a comment about it. Having started on another imap backend I dont really want to maintain 3 ... _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
