On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 11:19 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 10:32 +0930, Iain Buchanan wrote: > > I just replied to a message on an internal mailing list that I'm > > subscribed to at work. [snip] > > so why didn't it "thread"? I have the correct view, because other > > messages in my inbox are "threaded", ie. indented one below the other, > > but this one isn't. > > > > If the original mail with the matching message-id is still in the same > mailbox, there's no reason it shouldn't thread. Unless there is > something else going on.
Well then, "there is something going on"! Both messages are still in my inbox, unthreaded after a few restarts of evolution. A third message, a reply from the OP to myself, IS threaded under my message,but none of them are under the original. Like so: - A: original message from OP to list - other emails - B: reply to message 'A' from me to list - C: reply to 'B' from OP to me wierd huh? I still have all three messages in my inbox if you want further info. -- Iain Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
