I do and for pretty much the same reasons, which are a good techniques
for handling the issues Pascal describes..
Maybe he should write them up and publish them as a 'how to' or
in one of the Linux 'zines and if enough people adopt them
they will also complain.
Anyway, I'm #2 on the list for this request. Anyone else supporting
this effective way of handling mail, spam and resources?
/aja
> Subject: Re: [Evolution] Current pet-hates for evolution
> From: Jeffrey Stedfast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Pascal DeMilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: Evolution Mailing list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> <1000844323.26356.83.camel@dell> <1000886275.17275.21.camel@lancelot>
> <1000908579.669.8.camel@dell> <1000910112.25520.16.camel@lancelot>
> <1000932662.2556.17.camel@dell>
> Date: 19 Sep 2001 18:13:45 -0400
>
> On Wed, 2001-09-19 at 16:51, Pascal DeMilly wrote:
> >
> > The only problem with this solution is that Evolution use 2 lines per
> > IMAP account. One for the account and one for the Inbox folder. I
just
> > wish it would see that I subscribe to only one folder and inline it
wth
> > the account name.
>
> I'm sorry, but this won't ever happen. I don't see anyone else even
> wanting this feature anyway.
>
> Jeff
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
