On Thu, 2001-10-04 at 15:34, Dan Berger wrote: > I think there's a bug in bugzilla on the topic, no? Eventually it > would be friendlier if Evo did the "right thing" in both cases - since > the recipient has no control over the broken mailers on the send side > (hell, I'm ecstatic when I find someone who can spell pgp ;) > > On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 02:46:48PM -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > > The problem with in-line pgp encrypted messages is that we have to do > > evil hacks to detect and then decrypt the text and show it in the > > viewer. When we go to reply, we use a different code path that looks for > > the "message body" part and sends that off to the composer. It doesn't > > do any evil hacks to decrypt pgp encrypted blocks. > > > > Jeff > > > > -- > Dan Berger [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > http://home.ix.netcom.com/~dberger > Inter arma silent leges >
As some one who has correspondents obviously using in-line pgp encryption, I would also appreciate if Evo could work in either case. I am using email to communicate with other persons and telling those people to change their emailer because my email program is using a different spec is not going to happen. -- Ralph Sanford - If your government does not trust you, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - should you trust your government? DH/DSS Key - 0x7A1BEA01 _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
