Here's a bunch of (probably) stupid questions.
Any particular reason it was branched? Just curious since I though the
"normal" way was to remain in one branch until 1.0 then branch new
development.
So, to continue my ways of having the latest stuff from CVS, should I
change the GAL and Evolution branches also?
How is gtkhtml2 related to all this?
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 06:52, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Fri, 2001-11-30 at 05:37, Dan Hensley wrote:
> A few days ago I updated the Evolution 1 branch from CVS, and it's
> looking for gtkhtml 1.0. However, gtkhtml hasn't updated for a few
> days, and it's still at 0.16.1. Is it just that anoncvs hasn't caught
> up yet, or is there some disconnect?
>
gtkhtml has also been branched. Get the gtkhtml-1-0-branch from CVS
cheers
--
Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.gnome-db.org/ - http://www.ximian.com/
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
--
TTFN,
Lonnie Borntreger
------ ------ ------
Our mission is to authoritatively promote timely methods of
empowerment so that we may endeavor to collaboratively supply
inexpensive opportunities to exceed customer expectations
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
