On Don, 2001-12-13 at 20:42, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > No, evolution *does* respect the inline disposition. I'm not sure why > it's not displaying it, but I can tell you that the mailer that wrote > those headers is broken with respect to MIME. > > First off, a Content-Id value should be unique and *not* the name of the > image file. > > Secondly, the Content-Disposition header is completely broken... it > should be "Content-Disposition" not "ContentDisposition". > > Thirdly, the value after "inline;" should be > "filename=postcard-header.gif" not "postcard-header.gif" since > parameters must be in a name/value pair. We are rightfully parsing > "postcard-header.gif" as a parameter name that has no value. > > Jeff
wow, thanks. that was fast :-)) It's quite possible that the mailer is broken: it's a java bean I wrote ... seems I have missed a few parts of the spec thanks for those comments. They will help me a lot. I was only irritated by the fact that (forget about outlook) Netscape/Mozilla Mail client and also all web mail interfaces I tried displayed the content correctlyn with all images ... back to work Jens _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
