On Wed, 2002-01-23 at 15:14, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote: > No. 7.5M. I know, it's very cheap. But if every piece of software would > require its own particular versions of libraries....:(
If every library author understood interfaces and backward compatibility, this wouldn't be an issue either. Unfortunately, an ideal world this isn't. Portability between installations is more important than a minor savings through shared memory... just read through the mailing list archives over the past year from people whose contacts disappeared. You can definitely hack your configure.in, Makefile.am and source files to work with whatever version of db3 you want, though. The maintainers might even accept a patch to make it a configure-time conditional, but I think everyone knows the benefits and disadvantages of each approach. The thread is tiresome. Let it go. Thanks, Joe _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
