On Sun, 2002-02-24 at 19:53, Lonnie Borntreger wrote: > >From what I'm inferring from reading this message, the key issue is not > to find a key that deletes and moves up or down, but that the definition > of what the "previous" and "next" message to move to (for the "p" and > "n") or the "next" (for the delete action) does not match what this user > is expecting. The originator of the thread wants it to visually match > the sort type, not always fixed to "up" or "down" in the message list.
Yes, I realized that. I was, however, showing how a different mailer did it, ignoring the sorted issue. > So... the comment was that sorted by date follows the date field, in the > direction of the sort. If newest is at the top, then "next" is "up" not > "down". > For what it's worth, I agree with you, as do many developers of other > email clients. What do you think it should do when the sort is not by the date fields, but rather sorted by one of the other fields? rob _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
