On Mon, 2002-04-22 at 07:08, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > On Ne, 2002-04-21 at 21:48, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > My gues is that you were responding to a message that was not truly > > iso-8859-1, but rather windows-cp1252 or whatever. Since not all chars > > in windows-cp1252 can be encoded into iso-8859-2, we had to auto-detect > > the best charset to use which just happened to be UTF-8. > > The body of the original message (produced by mutt) was only 7bit ASCII. > As a matter of fact, most people in my country choose to use mutilated > language without accents in their emails. My reply only had ISO-8859-2 > characters.
Can you perhaps open a new bug on bugzilla.ximian.com, and attach both an example original message, and an example reply message to it? Thanks. > > > > IMHO, it's not our problem if other mailers don't support standard > > charsets. Other mailers send *us* not only non-standard charsets, but > > Well, the affected mailers are elm and pine. On the other hand, Outlook > is fine with UTF-8. Does setting the charset in the composer manually help any? Or is that what you were doing? > > sometimes even broken encodings yet we still have to deal with them. > > > > Summary: "it's not fair!" > > OK, but I don't like the idea of sending mail that people can't read. > They call me freak :-) Naah its good, less replies to deal with! _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
