I have set this now to keep the connection open (actually, today is the first time I am really running it that way), but I use procmail and have about 40 folders (instead of 600) I would like it to auto check. I know its not a minor task to code, but it would be really nice if I was able to say check these 40 folders and nothing else, not either just INBOX or everything.
Skadz On Sun, 2002-07-07 at 19:55, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > There's a checkbox to only check INBOX for auto-check... > > Jeff > > On Sun, 2002-07-07 at 18:51, Bill Kenworthy wrote: > > I also agree. I posted something like this some weeks ago. I use evo > > on both a local account and a remote imap one through a zebedee tunnel. > > The auto check keeps timing out on the delay it takes for the tunnel to > > reestablish, or gets tied up when the bandwidth (modem connection) is > > very tight. The no-op silently skips past problems like that. > > > > I eventually turned off auto-check as its creates more problems than it > > solved. A suggestion for large, remote mail collections would be to > > create a second account for the same mailbox, holding only the > > subfolders (subscribe to folders), whilst the account with autocheck > > could have only the inbox. > > > > Not everyone has the luxury of cheap, fast and low response time > > connections ... > > > > BillK > > > > On Sat, 2002-07-06 at 03:49, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > > > On Fri, 2002-07-05 at 14:18, Dan Winship wrote: > > > > > Since you can configure your IMAP account to auto-send-receive every X > > > > > minutes, there's no reason you even need the auto-10-minute-NOOP anyway, > > > > > just configure it to auto-send-receive every 10 minutes instead. This is > > > > > what I do and rarely if ever seem to have the disconnected problem. > > > > > > > > That's just wrong. You should not need to set an option to get correct > > > > behavior. If auto-send-receive is going to be mandatory for IMAP, then > > > > it shouldn't be possible to turn if off. > > > > > > I agree. Is there no chance at all that we can get the NOOP back? > > > > > > -- > > > Ettore Perazzoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > -- > Jeffrey Stedfast > Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Ryan P Skadberg E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Director of Technology U: http://www.mindstorm.com/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG fingerprint = 38A2 FF47 8FE3 B86A 7C68 6ECF 947D 4E9F 5FA9 637C ----------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
