Personally i disagree, if yfou want this, install a local smpt server and have it handle this.
On Wed, 2002-08-14 at 07:44, Kenneth Porter wrote: > On Tue, 2002-08-13 at 14:35, Kenneth Porter wrote: > > I've now got 3 messages in my outbox, 2 waiting for a SMTP server to > > come back up, and one to go to a known-up SMTP server. It apppears that > > the failure of the first server prevents evo from processing pending > > outbox entries for other servers. This message goes through a 3rd > > server, and I'm expecting it to also get queued in the outbox and not > > sent because of the unrelated downed server. > > As expected, my message was blocked. I moved the two blocking messages > to another folder temporarily, hit Send/Receive, and the messages going > through up servers were sent successfully. So the queue-runner for the > outbox needs to be made account-aware so that it continues to try to > send messages for accounts that are not failing. > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
