The essential ingredient is to have a "mark as spam" button readily available so that one can train a classifier (employing whatever method one chooses). I guess it would help to have a "mark as false positive" button as well, or perhaps make it a toggle.
T. On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 15:04, Christopher Ness wrote: > Hello again, > > A glance of /. lead me to http://www.paulgraham.com/spam.html and > bayesian filtering. Quite an in depth paper on spam and the math behind > *proper* filtering. An interesting read if you've got 10 minutes. > > In order for this filtering to occur it cannot happen on the server - I > suppose it could, but would be very taxing on resources - since each > person needs to taylor (pun intended) the probabilities of tokens > (words) to the type of spam and valid emails they get both in the > message and the header. > > Can others see how valuable a leading edge feature like this could be in > Evo? > > -- > Christopher Ness > > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
