On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 15:32, Ryan P Skadberg wrote: > On Thu, 2002-08-29 at 12:40, Peter Williams wrote: > > It is a bit disconcerting at first but it is the > > way it needs to be done. > > Needs to be done for what reason exactly?
It needs to be done because some people have a folder named Inbox in their namespace. Which Inbox is the real INBOX when you also have an Inbox folder in your namespace? Do you see the problem now? > Bad coding? Not at all. > Getting around > some other bug? No, just plain working correctly. > I don't understand how this NEEDS to be done in > evolution and does NOT need to be done in any other mail client out > there. It *does* need to be done in every other mail client out there, or they will have the same problems that Evolution 1.0.x had. Simple as that. > Obviously the Courier IMAP issue you mentioned must have been > solved by other mailers that do namespaces correctly, why can't > evolution also solve it? Nope, they are also broken. Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
