>>Currently we support the following SASL mechanisms: >>CRAM-MD5, DIGEST-MD5, KERBEROS_V4, LOGIN, PLAIN, and SPA (aka NTLM) >Some might say that a number of these, if not all, are not SASL. Others >might say, that they find you have a great product anyway and know what >you mean. They might also say that, on a Sunday, as an old employer of >mine once asked: "Ain't you got no home to go to?" >>We've also got code for ANONYMOUS, but it's not hooked up to anything >>iirc, mostly because it works slightly different from the rest. >>At some point we also plan on adding GSSAPI (but so far no one seems to >>have requested it?). >No. Well, I don't need it yet, either.
GSSAPI is what provides Kerberos V, yes? I've asked about this on the list a couple of times. I've seen other people ask about it. Kerberos networks are hardly rare, and becoming more common. Linux boxes in a WinY2k domain are almost certainly using Kerberos V. Please consider this requested. Evolution is the only app that I actually have to enter a password (beyond gdm of course) to access stuff. _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
