On Thu, 2002-09-05 at 11:00, Gene Imes wrote: > On Wed, 2002-09-04 at 06:04, Not Zed wrote: > > On Mon, 2002-09-02 at 00:55, Gene Imes wrote: > > > I have been using pine for a while and decided to switch to Evolution. I > > > like Evolution but it has some problems. So, what follows is a list of > > > what I think needs to be added or changed: > > > > > > 1. I have added several users to manage different mailing lists. So if I > > > have one of these accounts selected and click new message then the > > > 'From:' should be the address of the current folder selected. > > > > this has been requested before. > > And should be a thousand times until someone understands that some of us > want flexibility(configurability). > > > > > > 2. If I have an account selected in the 'Folder' bar an address book > > > relating specifically to that account should be available. > > > > hmm, but no such relationship exists. > > What does this mean? You can have an addressbook for each account. The > addresses I have are not common to each account (configurability?).
it means that there is no way to associate an account with an addressbook or vise versa. > > > > > > 3. If I click 'Reply', 'Reply to All', or 'Forward' then what should be > > > forwarded is what is displayed. i.e. If I have selected View->Message > > > Display->Show Email Source and the full email source is displayed then > > > that is what should be should be 'Replied' or 'Forwarded'. > > > > forward should use an attachment. this hasbee4n debated to death. > > > > replying, generally people do not want the headers, only the meaningful > > content (e.g. why would you reply to a mime message and include all > > encoded images and multiple parts, quoted, in an unusable form? that > > would be nuts). thats w3hat forward is for, to retain the full > > structure and content of the original. > > This may work for you but not for me. Why do you care what my motives > for wanting something. I don't want to forward email as an attachment I > want it inline and If the email source is displayed and I want to > forward it then why shouldn't I be able to do this? Example: I get some > spam and know who the originating ISP is so I want to send forward an > email to them requesting they remedy the situation and the proof is the > email source. Forward as Attachment is the preferred method, trust me. Then the ISP gets the raw message in a nice friendly MIME structure which will preserve wrapping (which will not happen if you forward it inline). Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
