On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 04:51, Mike Godfrey wrote: > Aha, so the beta is, presumably, more stable. Thanks. > > (maybe this could be made more obvious on the channel selection > screens.)
I'm not sure its really required. Almost every project has the concept of a 'nightly build' or snapshot, which is known to be bleeding edge, and hence possibly wont even run at all. Likewise the conventions for beta imply a more stable near-release-ready version. > On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 12:57, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > > On Wed, 2002-09-25 at 09:43, Mike Godfrey wrote: > > > What's the difference between the "evo dev snapshot" channel and the > > > "evo beta" channel? > > > > Snapshots are built every day from CVS, the Beta is a "blessed" release. > > > > -- > > Ettore Perazzoli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > -- > Michael Godfrey PhD, Assistant Professor > Nortel Networks Jr Chair, Telecommunications Software Engineering > Univ of Waterloo, School of Computer Science > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > URL: http://www.uwaterloo.ca/~migod > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
