No, the threading is correct, if you check the references headers. The vfolder scheme question was a reply of the multisync message.
On Mon, 2002-10-28 at 16:22, Tianran Chen wrote: > I didn't looked at the code in Evolution, I'm not so sure how the > Evolution match the threads. There are few messages that do not seems to > belong to the same thread are listed into a thread. I don't know this is > a bug or just the way it is. > > These are the summary of the mismatched messages: > > > From: Bo Lincoln <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Evolution] MultiSync > Date: 27 Oct 2002 21:24:31 +0100 > > > From: Not Zed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: HvR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Evolution] looking for definition of vfolder scheme > language > Date: 28 Oct 2002 13:32:55 +1030 > > > From: HvR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Not Zed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Evolution] looking for definition of vfolder scheme > language > Date: 27 Oct 2002 19:33:59 -0800 > > > From: Jean-Marc V. Liotier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Evolution] MultiSync > Date: 28 Oct 2002 02:04:37 +0100 > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
