woops... doh! attached this time :-)
On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 16:14, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> what attached real example?
>
> Jeff
>
> On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 00:02, simran wrote:
> > Talking about disappearing headers from emails... i get approx 200
> > emails a day (on a few lists) and on average 3-4 a day that are bad (see
> > attached real example).
> >
> > The "bad messages" seem to have virtually everything stripped from the
> > headers... does anyone else have a similar issue? I assumed it is a
> > smapcop setup issue (as 123ehost.com where i host my email setup smapcop
> > recently) and i have only had the problem since they set that up (about
> > 2 months ago) - however, though i would ask the list, just in case its a
> > known evolution issue?
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 2002-11-04 at 14:07, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > > You probably need to pick a font that works for your setup.
> > >
> > > go to the GNOME Control Centre and change it.
> > >
> > > Jeff
> > >
> > > On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 21:32, Hamid Ghadyani wrote:
> > > > Hi there,
> > > > IO just encountered this weird situation. Evolution was working
> > > > perfectly when I tried to add my native language to Redhat 8.0, but I
> > > > kept using U.S. english keyboard and locale. Now when I open the
> > > > Evolution, I can't see no summary text (only some small tiny weather
> > > > icons) and all of the emails don't have the normal header : Sender,
> > > > sunject, recipent ... And the worse, some of the even don't have the
> > > > message body. I am sure there are something inside them, because when I
> > > > go to File menu and ask for a print preview, everything is there and I
> > > > can see the email !!!!
> > > > Anybody have any idea ?
> > > > Thanks
> > > >
> > > > Hamid
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > > --
> > > Jeffrey Stedfast
> > > Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> --
> Jeffrey Stedfast
> Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com
>
>
>
>
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 1 03:03:00 2002
X-Evolution-Source:
pop:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/inbox
From:
Date: 01 Nov 2002 03:03:00 +1100
Subject: No Subject
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
"The Apache HTTP Server Project is proud to announce the sixth public =
release of Apache 2.0. Apache 2.0 has been running on the apache.org =
website since December of 2000 and has proven to be very reliable."
I don't know of a better endorsement for the Apache 2.0.x series. The =
general feeling in my enterprise is that Apache 2.0.x adoption rate is =
skyrocketing and we are moving to it across the board. Also consider the =
parity now available in Apache on Win2k platforms. Apache 2.0.x is the =
first Apache with such parity between *nix and Win2k.
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Remo Mattei [mailto:remo@;italy1.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:07
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [users@httpd] Apache 2.x
Hi guys can someone tell me if the version 2.0.x that comes with RH 8 is =
a good stable version of I still should use the 1.3.x since this is =
going to be a big server that will have several hits.
=20
Thanks,=20
REMO
------------------------------
End of users Digest
***********************************
