Sorry - I should of mentioned that.  With my fake uname library in
place, I do indeed get that dialogue box.  But to try to catch a truss
or some better idea of why it thought I was now wrong, I was running it
by hand without the wrapper script to get that crash...

Sorry I left this out.

Mark.

On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 16:09, Benjamin Kahn wrote:
> Mark,
>       Thanks for the report.  You're right.  Something is wonky for Solaris
> 8.  We'll have this fixed in a few hours.
> 
>       (On a real Solaris 8 box, you should have gotten a dialog box telling
> you that the distribution wasn't supported instead of the crash.)  It'll
> be back being supported some time today.
> 
> On Tue, 2002-11-05 at 08:22, Mark R. Bowyer wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I'm getting the following error from red-carpet as of this morning:
> > 
> >   :
> > [cddb90]: Reading from the cache:
> > file:///var/cache/redcarpet/red-carpet.ximian.com:80/distributions.xml
> > 
> > 
> > libredcarpet-ERROR **: file rc-distro.c: line 733
> > (rc_distro_get_status): assertion failed: (system_distro)
> > aborting...
> > Abort (core dumped)
> > 
> > A bit of research shows that the distributions.xml file (when ungzipped)
> > has two <distro> blocks at the top for Solaris 7 and 8, both marked
> > <status> "internal", and then Solaris 7 and 8 both turn up again lower
> > down as retired and supported respectively, and 9 shown as
> > presupported.  In all cases the same uname commands and responses are
> > shown for the <detect> block.
> > 
> > As far as I can make out, no other OS shows the same version twice with
> > different statii (Latin was never my strong point ;O) and the
> > distributions file was updated last night...  Can I surmise that these
> > "internal" blocks were left in by mistake, and are causing this problem,
> > or do I suddenly have a compatibility problem here?
> > 
> > I should point out I'm actually running on a new Solaris 10 alpha build,
> > and am using a LD_PRELOADed uname-fixing library to get red-carpet to
> > work on it.  Not supported, but worked nicely thank you up until now ;O)
-- 
o o                                        mailto:Moredhel@;earthling.net
/v\ark R. Bowyer  http://www.bowyer.screaming.net    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`-'               ------------------------------------------------------
 /"\
 \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign     fingerprint   = 7924 9E9E 7B91 225E B065 
  X  Against HTML Mail         1024D/19BC72F6  39D0 551D ABE6 1514 0DC1
 / \ 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to