???#$!!!!!
Guys, you are speaking at a level that my brain can't compile it.
Does what you said answer my question or I am too newbie ?

Thanks
Hamid
On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 05:06, Chris Toshok wrote:
> On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 01:18, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> > ons, 2002-11-06 kl. 19:57 skrev Hamid:
> > 
> > > No one wants to help me regarding following issue ???
> > 
> > Me too, with 1.0.8. But I don't miss it.
> > 
> > Just be glad you don't use the LDAP possibility for mailing lists,
> > LDAP-based mailing lists don't work at all with Evo. (Actually, by
> > creating and maintaing them with GQ you can work around this, but don't
> > tell Chris Toshok, he's supposed to be "working on this.")
> 
> It's not like creating them and maintaining them with a different tool
> will help with evolution.  You might very well find that your chose
> schema isn't easily convertible to the one evolution ends up using (when
> it eventually starts doing distribution lists over ldap).  BTW, what
> sort of template/objectclasses are you using for them?
> 
> Show me an email client that actually does contact lists over ldap (not
> active directory) and I'll be happy to interoperate with them.  Show me
> a schema that doesn't get the LDAP extremists up in arms and that
> doesn't (like groupOfNames) require me to fire of N individual queries
> for a list with N entries, and I'll consider using it.
> 
> Until you can show me either of these things, or until I can come up
> with examples of my own, or until someone orders me to just get this
> done regardless of the ramifications of creationg another crappy schema
> ala evolutionPerson, this will remain on the back burner as far as I'm
> concerned.
> 
> So yes, I am working on this.
> 
> Chris




_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Reply via email to